data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05241/05241f7faab86c47b8e58acf7611b37efb14447a" alt=""
Writer William Safire contributes to the
New York Times Magazine's
section
On Language; if you haven't read it before, it's very well done. Each week the section looks at how our language is evolving, devolving or just changing in no particular direction. In the Jan. 13 issue, in a piece called "
Of the Migrating Of: A Preposition Proposition," Safire questions
of — the way we use it, the amount we use and whether or not the little two-letter word is even required in most sentences. He starts the piece: "I could
of avoided this subject because it's not too big
of a deal, but to observe these mistakes a couple times a day — and to see one as the headline
of a full-page ad accepted by at least two major newspapers — makes me want to fall off
of my chair." (Bold and italicized
ofs added by me.) Think about it: How many times do we recklessly throw an
of into a sentence? "Today's not that bad of a day." "How long of a lecture should I schedule?" "I spoke a couple of times." Take that last sentence, for example: "a few" would work just as good and it eliminates
of.
The article goes into more depth, but the general point is that
of is overly used in American writing and speech. And that's a heck of a point to make.
My challenge to myself and everyone else: Use
of much less.
No comments:
Post a Comment